QUESTION 1 OF 10 - VENDOR LANDSCAPE
10%
VENDOR LANDSCAPE
QUESTION 2 OF 10 - POST-IMPLEMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY
20%
POST-IMPLEMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY
QUESTION 3 OF 10 - OPERATIONAL CONTINUITY
30%
OPERATIONAL CONTINUITY
QUESTION 4 OF 10 - PLATFORM OPTIMIZATION
40%
PLATFORM OPTIMIZATION
QUESTION 5 OF 10 - REPORTING VISIBILITY
50%
REPORTING VISIBILITY
QUESTION 6 OF 10 - AI AND AUTOMATION
60%
AI AND AUTOMATION
QUESTION 7 OF 10 - INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE
70%
INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE
QUESTION 8 OF 10 - INTERNAL CAPACITY
80%
INTERNAL CAPACITY
QUESTION 9 OF 10 - INVESTMENT VALUE
90%
INVESTMENT VALUE
QUESTION 10 OF 10 - READINESS FOR CHANGE
100%
READINESS FOR CHANGE
21 / 40
REACTIVE ENVIRONMENT
Score range: 0 – 14
Your environment is carrying visible operational drag.

The contact center may be running, but ownership, continuity, visibility, or optimization are not structured enough to support consistent performance. In mid-market environments, this often shows up as slow issue resolution, vendor handoffs, internal bottlenecks, and platform value that remains unrealized.

What this typically signals:
  • Accountability gaps likely exist across vendors, internal teams, or support contracts.
  • Platform performance and reporting may be under-managed relative to the investment.
  • Institutional knowledge and escalation paths may be too dependent on specific individuals.

Recommended next step: The right starting point is an honest diagnostic. Our experts can help you map where the gaps are.

Not ready to talk yet? Explore our managed services offerings to understand what the right support structure looks like for your environment.

21 / 40
Partially Managed
Score range: 15 – 25
You have a working foundation, but meaningful gaps remain.

The environment is functional, but there are likely areas where ownership is unclear, optimization is inconsistent, reporting requires too much interpretation, or support is reactive. These gaps may not feel urgent every day, but they tend to compound as the platform, team, and customer expectations grow.

What this typically signals:
  • Optimization is likely happening in bursts rather than through a steady operating rhythm.
  • Vendor coordination or internal capacity may be creating hidden overhead.
  • There may be measurable value left in the platform, especially around reporting, workflow, and automation.

Recommended next step:  We can show you specifically where the gaps are and what it would take to close them.

Not ready to talk yet? Explore our managed services offerings to understand what the right support structure looks like for your environment.

21 / 40
Structured but Under-Optimized
Score range: 26 – 34
Your environment has structure, but may not be improving fast enough.

You have many of the right foundations in place: some accountability, some continuity, and a workable support model. The question is whether the environment is actively moving forward or simply being maintained. At this stage, the opportunity is usually less about basic support and more about optimization, automation, reporting confidence, and partner depth.

What this typically signals:
  • AI, automation, or reporting improvements may represent the highest-value next step.
  • A more proactive operating cadence could unlock better performance from the existing platform.
  • The current support model may work today, but may not scale with future CX priorities.

Recommended next step:  Organizations at this level typically benefit most from a strategic advisory conversation — where is the environment in 18 months, and who's accountable for getting it there? We have a standing advisory conversation we offer to organizations at this level. No commitment — just a senior practitioner's view of where the environment could go.

Not ready to talk yet? Explore our managed services offerings to understand what the right support structure looks like for your environment.

21 / 40
Mature & Scalable
Score range: 35 – 40
Your environment appears well-structured.

Your operating model has strong signs of maturity: clear ownership, reliable continuity, trusted visibility, and enough structure to support change. The opportunity at this stage is to make sure the environment continues to evolve as the business does - especially around automation, AI, optimization, and strategic platform value.

What this typically signals:
  • Strong foundations should allow faster, safer change.
  • The next frontier is likely expansion, efficiency, or advanced optimization rather than basic stabilization.
  • It may still be worth evaluating whether the current partner model has the engineering and advisory depth to match future ambition.

Recommended next step:  Even well-run environments benefit from a second opinion. We're happy to review your current setup and share what we're seeing across comparable environments.

Not ready to talk yet? Explore our managed services offerings to understand what the right support structure looks like for your environment.

Your report is being generated. We'll email your personalized report to
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.